Monday, August 8, 2011

Benefits to Unemployed Youth under PMEGP

PMEGP was launched in the year 2008 by merging the then Prime Minister’s Rojgar Yojana (PMRY) and Rural Employment Generation Programme (REGP) schemes with a higher level of subsidy than PMRY and REGP. Under PMEGP, the beneficiary can directly approach Bank/Financial Institution along with his/her project proposal or it can be sponsored by KVIC/KVIBs/ DIC/Panchayat Karyalayas etc. The applications received directly by the Banks are referred to the Task Force Committee, constituted at district level under the chairmanship of District Magistrate/Deputy Commissioner/Collector to scrutinize the applications based on the experience, technical qualification, skill, viability of the project etc. and hold quarterly meeting with the Banks at district level to review the status of the project proposals.
          During the last three years, since the launch of Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP), the estimated number of employment opportunities created is 10.98 lakh persons.
State/Union Territory (UT) – wise details of estimated employment opportunities created under PMEGP        
                                                                                        (No. of persons)

S. No.
States/UTs
Estimated employment opportunities created under PMEGP


2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
1
Chandigarh
160
500
34
2
Delhi
10
348
140
3
Haryana
4840
4283
9748
4
Himachal Pradesh
3090
1963
4569
5
Jammu and Kashmir
6800
17820
15953
6
Punjab
2660
8764
7280
7
Rajasthan
5400
13299
25606
8
Andaman & Nicobar Islands
400
264
447
9
Bihar
58730
5112
7980
10
Jharkhand
4980
3250
15576
11
Orissa
16540
17812
6611
12
West Bengal
40020
69203
44440
13
Arunachal Pradesh
1140
1380
2510
14
Assam
12260
15280
28656
15
Manipur
0
1166
1626
16
Meghalaya
0
2167
1782
17
Mizoram
0
1705
3800
18
Nagaland
50
286
1924
19
Tripura
250
1710
1513
20
Sikkim
100
266
284
21
Andhra Pradesh
8650
73417
53515
22
Karnataka
12200
17198
13730
23
Kerala
3650
15970
16620
24
Lakshadweep
0
120
200
25
Puducherry
480
396
817
26
Tamil Nadu
11970
45511
31895
27
Goa
10
1409
1583
28
Gujarat
2680
7892
16905
29
Maharashtra
16920
21961
26745
30
Chhattishgarh
5840
7410
10178
31
Madhya Pradesh
4160
12294
19692
32
Uttarakhand
3840
8345
  6746
33
Uttar Pradesh
27240
41536
44128

Urban Unemployment Gurantee Scheme

As per Government of India (Allocation of Business Rules), 1961, Department of Rural Development, Ministry of Rural Development is the Nodal Ministry for (a) All matters pertaining to rural employment or unemployment such as working out of strategies and programmes for rural employment including special works, wages or income generation and training related thereto. (b) Implementation of the specific programmes of rural employment evolved from time to time (c) Micro level planning related to rural employment or unemployment and administrative infrastructure. Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation is the Nodal Ministry for implementation of the specific programmes of Urban Employment and Urban Poverty Alleviation including other programmes evolved from time to time.

Government of India has no proposal under consideration to launch any Urban Employment Guarantee Scheme on the lines of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in the country. However, Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation has been implementing an employment oriented Centrally Sponsored Scheme for urban areas, namely, Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana (SJSRY) on all India basis with effect from 1st December, 1997. The Scheme has been comprehensively revamped in February, 2009 to address various issues arising from implementation.

Migration of Labourers

Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, both Central and State Governments are appropriate Governments to fix , review and revise the minimum wages for workers employed in scheduled employments under their respective jurisdiction. Information in respect of firm wages is not maintained. However, the National Floor Level Minimum Wages has been increased from Rs. 100/- to Rs. 115/- per day with effect from 01.04.2011. The State Governments are persuaded to fix/revise minimum wages in such a way that in none of the scheduled employments the minimum wages is less than National Floor Level Minimum Wages.

Bonded Labourers System (Abolition) Act, 1976

The data relating to bonded labourers is not maintained sex-wise. According to the reports received from the State Governments, the number of bonded labourers identified, released and rehabilitated under the Centrally Sponsored Plan Scheme is as under:-
Name of the State
Number of Bonded Labourers
Identified and Released
Rehabilitated
Andhra Pradesh
37,988
31,534
Arunachal Pradesh
3,526
2,992
Bihar
14,615
13,797
Chhattisgarh
812
812
Gujarat
64
64
Haryana
591
89
Jharkhand
196
196
Karnataka
63,437
57,185
Kerala
823
710
Madhya Pradesh
13,317
12,392
Maharashtra
1,404
1,325
Orissa
50,029
46,901
Punjab
69
69
Rajasthan
7,488
6,331
Tamil Nadu
65,573
65,573
Uttar Pradesh
29,046
29,046
Uttaranchal
5
5
West Bengal
344
344
Total
2,89,327
2,69,365
               
                The Supreme Court has directed that the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) should be involved in dealing with the issue of bonded labour. The court has also issued directions from time to time for compliance by the state governments regarding identification, release and rehabilitation of bonded labourers. In pursuance of the direction of the Supreme Court, NHRC is monitoring and reviewing the efforts made by the state governments towards implementing the provisions of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, through regular interaction with the concerned authorities. NHRC also conducts familiarization-cum-sensitization workshops on the elimination of bonded labour and child labour at the state level.
The Constitution of India under Article 23(1) prohibits ‘begar’ and other similar forms of forced labour. The bonded labour system was abolished by law throughout the country w.e.f. from 25th October, 1975 under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Ordinance which was replaced by Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976. It extends to the whole of India. As per the Act, no person is allowed to make an advance under or in pursuance of the bonded labour system and no one can compel any person to render any bonded labour or other form of forced labour.
                No checks have been imposed on the funds sanctioned for utilization of identifying bonded and child labour.

Contract Workers

The employers in the mines/industries both in public as well as private sectors can engage contract workers in their establishments as per their requirements if the contract work has not been prohibited under Section 10(1) of Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970. In the establishments falling under Central Sphere, regular inspections are conducted and appropriate action is taken including filing of prosecutions by Central Industrial Relations Machinery (CIRM) headed by Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 so as to safeguard the interest of workers.

Apart from action under Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970, short or non payment of wages, if reported under Minimum Wages Act and/or Payment of Wages Act, action is also taken by way of filing claim cases before the Authorities concerned.

Registered Unemployed

The Minister of Labour and Employment  Mallikarjun Kharge August 08  informed the Lok Sabha that Government of India is fully aware of magnitude of problem of unemployment among the educated youth in the country. Basic problem in the country is not of unemployment but of under employment. The poor cannot afford to remain unemployed and therefore, unemployment rate among the poor is very low as compared to educated youth who are from the relatively better of economic family background. Higher the level of education attainment, higher is the rate of unemployment. This is because of the fact that they can afford to remain unemployed to search for better employment opportunities. In order to bridge the employment gap to harness the benefit of demographic dividend, Government of India has undertaken Skilled Development Mission to make them more employable for engaging them in more productive employment.

Replying to a written question in the Lok Sabha today th e Minister said that the total number of youth job seekers in the age group of 15-29 year, all of whom may not necessarily be unemployed , registered with employment exchanges as on 31-12-2008 combined for rural and urban areas was 2.70 crore.

Government have taken several steps to reduce unemployment in the country. The focus is on creation of productive employment at a faster pace in order to raise incomes of masses to bring about a general improvement in their living conditions. The job opportunities are created on account of growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), investment in infrastructure development, growth in exports etc.

UNICEF’S Report on the State of the World’s Children-2011 has reported that with 81 million young people out of work, youth unemployment is now a concern in almost every country. Adolescents struggle to find decent work guaranteeing them a foot hold above the poverty line. In many developing countries, the paucity of opportunities for productive full-time employment means that the first experience of work for young people is too often one of waste talent, disillusionment, under employment and continued poverty. However, the observation does not hold good for Indian Labour Market. Recent NSSO survey reveals a major trend of the past five years has been a decline in labour force participation rate. The decline in labour force participation rate could mainly be due to the increase in participation of the young population in education and increase in wages of principal status workers over the years.

Government of India has also been implementing various employment generation programmes, and important ones are: Swarana Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana (SJSRY); Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP); Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) and Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) besides entrepreneurial development programmes run by the Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises.

Development and Promotion of MSMEs

The report submitted by the Task Force on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) has made recommendations on policy / programme support, institutional matters and legal / regulatory measures for the growth of MSMEs in the country. The recommendations made cover the thematic areas of credit, taxation, labour issues, infrastructure / technology / skill development, marketing, rehabilitation and exit policy and special measures for North-Eastern Region and Jammu and Kashmir. On the thematic area of credit, the Task Force has made various recommendations for enhancing its flow to the sector which, inter alia, include: (i) 20 per cent year-on-year growth in credit to micro and small enterprises (MSEs); (ii) strict adherence to allocation of 60 per cent of MSE credit to micro enterprises and (iii) 15 per cent annual growth in number of micro enterprise accounts by scheduled commercial banks.

. Based on the recommendations of the Working Group constituted to review the Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGS), Reserve Bank of India has issued instructions in May, 2010 making it mandatory for banks not to accept collateral security in the case of loans upto Rs.10 lakh extended to units in the MSE sector. RBI has informed that whenever any specific complaint against a bank is received, the matter is taken up with the Head Office of the concerned banks to resolve the issue. Banks have also set up MSME Care Centres to facilitate entrepreneurs for quick redressal of their grievances.

Further downgrades may lie ahead


A day after Standard & Poor's took the unprecedented step of downgrading the creditworthiness of the U.S. government to AA(PLUS) from AAA, the ratings agency offered a full-throated defence of its decision, calling the bitter standoff between President Barack Obama and Congress over raising the debt ceiling a “debacle” and warning that further downgrades may lie ahead.
In an unusual August 06 conference call with reporters, senior S&P officials insisted the ratings firm hadn't overstepped its bounds by focusing on the political paralysis in Washington as much as fiscal policy in determining the new rating.
“The debacle over the debt ceiling continued until almost the midnight hour,” said John B. Chambers, chairman of S&P's sovereign ratings committee. Another S&P official, David Beers, added that “fiscal policy, like other government policy, is fundamentally a political process.”
Administration officials at the White House and Treasury angrily criticised S&P's action as based on faulty budget accounting that discounted the just-enacted deal for increasing the debt limit.
The agreement set spending caps in the fiscal year that begins October 1 and calls for a bipartisan congressional “super committee” to propose more deficit reduction for up to $2.5 trillion in combined savings over a decade.
“The bipartisan compromise on deficit reduction was an important step in the right direction,” said White House press secretary Jay Carney in a statement on Saturday. “Yet, the path to getting there took too long and was at times too divisive. We must do better to make clear our nation's will, capacity and commitment to work together to tackle our major fiscal and economic challenges.”
In August 06 conference call, Mr. Chambers said the $2 trillion difference, in one scenario for 2021, equals only about 2 per cent of gross domestic product and doesn't alter the fundamental reality that the debt burden would continue to rise.
Speculative
Randy Neugebauer, Republican, who heads the House Financial Services' subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said while it was appropriate for S&P to consider the political situation in its analysis, it was speculative of it to use predictions of what Congress will likely do in the future as a rationale for a downgrade.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

India faces Rs 1.83 lakh crore exposure to U.S. debt


As one of the 15-largest foreign creditors to the U.S., India’s exposure to the United States’ ballooning debts is estimated at USD 41 billion — higher than the money America owes to countries like France and Australia.
The overall national debt of the U.S. is moving nearer to USD 15 trillion, out of which it owes over USD 4.5 trillion to foreign countries holding the U.S. government debt securities.
While China is the single-largest holder of the U.S. treasury securities with USD 1.15 trillion, India stands at 14th position with USD 41 billion (about Rs 1.83 lakh crore), as per the US Treasury Department.
The unprecedented debt downgrade of the U.S. from the top-notch ‘AAA’ level by Standard and Poor’s might also lead to an immediate action by Reserve Bank of India, which allows holding of government debt securities of countries with mostly a ‘Triple-A’ rating.
While a vast majority of the USD 41 billion portfolio is owned by RBI itself, some Indian banks also might have some exposure, sources said.
They said that the RBI was most likely to allow holding of the US securities even with a notch-lower rating, as it has been itself amassing the US treasury securities over the past one year despite a deepening debt crisis there.
The Indian holding has grown by about USD 10 billion in the past one year, the U.S. Treasury data shows.
The RBI holds the US treasury securities as part of its foreign exchange reserves and the dollar holdings account for about 10 per cent of its total portfolio.
Some experts pointed out that India has been increasing its exposure on the pretext that the US debt bonds were one of the most secure from default risks.
However, the U.S., which was on the brink of defaulting on its debt obligations last week, was saved by way of a last-minute deal reached by President Barack Obama to raise the country’s USD 14.3 trillion borrowing ceiling.
Rating agency S&P, which has based its downgrade of the country’s rating on the political opposition to the government plans to fight the debt problems, has termed the rescue plan as inadequate to tackle the U.S. debt situation.
While an exposure of USD 41 billion is a substantial figure from Indian context, this accounts for less than 0.3 per cent of the U.S.’ total debt and just about 1 per cent of its total foreign debts.
In fact, the Indian exposure is equivalent to an estimated USD 40 billion worth treasury bonds held by one single entity, Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway.
The overall foreign holding of the US government securities has grown by about USD 500 billion in past one year, while China has increased its exposure by about USD 300 billion during this period.
Among top foreign creditors, China is followed by Japan (USD 912 billion), the UK (USD 346 billion), Brazil (USD 211 billion), Taiwan (USD 153 billion), Hong Kong (122 billion), Russia (USD 115 billion), Switzerland (USD 108 billion), Canada (USD 91 billion), Luxembourg (USD 68 billion), Germany (USD 61 billion), Thailand (USD 60 billion), Singapore (USD 57 billion) and India (USD 51 billion).
Countries with lower exposure than India include Turkey, Ireland, South Korea, Belgium, Poland, Mexico, Italy, Netherlands, France, Philippines, Norway, Sweden, Colombia, Israel, Chile, Egypt, Malaysia and Australia in the respective order.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

An Overview of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in India

A detailed literature survey shows that micro and small enterprises contribute to economic growth through several pathways that go beyond job creation.  In India, the Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) sector plays a pivotal role in the overall industrial economy of the country. It is estimated that in terms of value, the sector accounts for about 39% of the manufacturing output and around 33% of the total export of the country. Further, in recent years the MSE sector has consistently registered higher growth rate compared to the overall industrial sector. The major advantage of the sector is its employment potential at low capital cost. As per available statistics, this sector employs an estimated 31 million persons spread over 12.8 million enterprises and the labour intensity in the MSE sector is estimated to be almost 4 times higher than the large enterprises.

In accordance with the provision of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) are classified in two Classes:

  (a) Manufacturing Enterprises: The enterprises engaged in the manufacture or production of goods pertaining to any industry specified in the first schedule to the industries (Development and regulation) Act, 1951). The Manufacturing Enterprise are defined in terms of investment in Plant & Machinery.

(b) Service Enterprises:  The enterprises engaged in providing or rendering of services and are defined in terms of investment in equipment.

Government Policies and Support Measure: A Brief History
The evolution of the policy framework and support measures of the Government of India can be broadly grouped into the following three periods:

1948-1991: 
In all the Policy Resolutions from 1948 to 1991, recognition was given to the micro and small enterprises, termed as an effective tool to expand employment opportunities, help ensure equitable distribution of the national income and facilitate effective mobilization of private sector resources of capital and skills. The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Organisation [earlier known as Small Industries Development Organization (SIDO)] was set up in 1954 as an apex body for sustained and organised growth of micro, small and medium enterprises.

Within next two years, the National Small Industries Corporation, the Khadi and Village Industries Commission and the Coir Board were also set up. The era provided the supportive measures that were required to nurture MSEs, in the form of reservation of items for their exclusive manufacture, access to bank credit on priority through the Priority Sector Lending Programme of commercial banks, excise exemption, reservation under the Government Purchase Programme and 15% price preference in purchases, infrastructure development and establishment of institutes for entrepreneurial and skill development. MSME – Development Institutes [earlier known as Small Industries Service Institute (SISI)] were set up all over India to train youth in skills/entrepreneurship. Tool Rooms were established with German and Danish assistance for providing technical services essential to MSEs as also for skill training. At the State level, District Industries Centres were set up all over the country.

1991-1999:
The new Policy for Small, Tiny and Village Enterprises of August, 1991 laid the framework for government support in the context of liberalisation, which sought to replace protection with competitiveness to infuse more vitality and growth to MSEs in the face of foreign competition and open market. Supportive measures concentrated on improving infrastructure, technology and quality. Testing Centres were set up for quality certification and new Tool Rooms as well as Sub-contracting Exchanges were established. The Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and a Technology Development and Modernisation Fund were created to accelerate finance and technical services to the sector. A Delayed Payment Act was enacted to facilitate prompt payment of dues to MSEs and an Industrial Infrastructure Development (IID) scheme was launched to set mini industrial estates for small industries. 1999 onwards: The Ministry of MSME [earlier known as Ministry of Small Scale Industries and Agro & Rural Industries (SSI & ARI)] came into being from 1999 to provide focused attention to the development and promotion of the sector.

The new Policy Package, announced in August 2000, sought to address the persisting problems relating to credit, infrastructure, technology and marketing. A Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme was launched to encourage technology up-gradation in the MSE sector and a Credit Guarantee Scheme was started to provide collateral-free loans to micro and small entrepreneurs, particularly the first generation entrepreneurs. The exemption limit for relief from payment of Central Excise duty was raised to Rs.1 crore ($0.25 million) and a Market Development Assistance Scheme for MSEs was introduced. At the same time, consultations were held with stakeholders and the list of products reserved for production in the MSE sector was gradually reduced each year. In 2006, the long-awaited enactment for this sector finally became a reality with the passage of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Act. In March, 2007, a third Package for the Promotion of Micro and Small Enterprises was announced which comprises the proposals/schemes having direct impact on the promotion and development of the micro and small enterprises, particularly in view of the fast changing economic environment, wherein to be competitive is the key of success.

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 seeks to facilitate the development of these enterprises as also enhance their competitiveness. It provides the first-ever legal framework for recognition of the concept of “enterprise” which comprises both manufacturing and service entities. It defines medium enterprises for the first time and seeks to integrate the three tiers of these enterprises, namely, micro, small and medium.

The Act also provides for a statutory consultative mechanism at the national level with balanced representation of all sections of stakeholders, particularly the three classes of enterprises; and with a wide range of advisory functions. Establishment of specific Funds for the promotion, development and enhancing competitiveness of these enterprises, notification of schemes/programmes for this purpose, progressive credit policies and practices, preference in Government procurement to products and services of the micro and small enterprises, more effective mechanisms for mitigating the problems of delayed payments to micro and small enterprises and assurance of a scheme for easing the closure of business by these enterprises are some of the other features of the Act.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy
With the promulgation of the MSMED Act, 2006, the restrictive 24% ceiling prescribed for equity holding by industrial undertakings, whether domestic or foreign, in the MSEs has been done away with and MSEs are defined solely on the basis of investment in plant and machinery (manufacturing enterprises) and equipment (service enterprises). Thus, the present policy on FDI in MSE permit FDI subject only to the sectoral equity caps, entry routes and other relevant sectoral regulations.

The issue of de-reservation had been a subject of animated debate within government for more than twenty years. The Approach to the Eleventh Five Year Plan noted the adverse implications of reservation of products for exclusive manufacture by the MSEs and recommended the policy of progressive de-reservation.

To facilitate further investments for technological up-gradation and higher productivity in the micro and small enterprises, 654 items have been taken off the list of items reserved for exclusive manufacture by the manufacturing micro and small enterprises in the last few years – reducing it to 21 at present. This has helped the sector in enlarging the scale of operations and also paved the way for entry of larger enterprises in the manufacture of these products in keeping with the global standards.

Credit/Finance
Credit is one of the critical inputs for the promotion and development of the micro and small enterprises. Some of the features of existing credit policy for the MSEs are:

Priority Sector Lending: 
Credit to the MSEs is part of the Priority Sector Lending Policy of the banks. For the public and private sector banks, 40% of the net bank credit (NBC) is earmarked for the Priority Sector. For the foreign banks, however, 32% of the NBC is earmarked for the Priority Sector, of which 10% is earmarked for the MSE sector. Any shortfall in such lending by the foreign banks has to be deposited in the Small Enterprise Development Fund (SEDF) to be set up by the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI).

Institutional Arrangement:
The SIDBI is the principal financial institution for promotion, financing and development of the MSE sector. Apart from extending financial assistance to the sector, it coordinates the functions of institutions engaged in similar activities. SIDBI's major operations are in the areas of : (i) refinance assistance (ii) direct lending, and (iii) development and support services. Commercial banks are important channels of credit dispensation to the sector and play a pivotal role in financing the working capital requirements, besides providing term loans (in the form of composite loans). At the State level, State Financial Corporations (SFCs) and twin-functional State Industrial Development Corporations (SIDCs) are the main sources of long-term finance for the MSE sector.

Recognising the importance of easy and adequate availability of credit in sustainable growth of the MSE sector, the Government has announced a “Policy Package for Stepping Up Credit to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)”, with the objective of doubling the flow of credit to this sector within a period of five years.

Emerging Sources:
Faced with increased competition on account of globalisation, MSMEs are beginning to move from an obsession with bank credit to a variety of other specialized financial services and options. In recent years, the country has witnessed increased flow of capital in the form of primary/secondary securities market, venture capital and private equity, external commercial borrowings, factoring services, etc. More advanced MSMEs have started realising the importance of these alternative sources of funding to raise resources and the need for adopting better governance norms to take advantage of these funding sources. The enactment of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 is expected to provide a thrust to the MSMEs in their move towards corporatisation.

Competitive Technology
In today's fast paced global business scenario, technology has become more vital than ever before. With a view to foster the growth of MSME sector in the country, Government has set up ten state-of-the-art Tool Rooms and Training Centers. These Tool Rooms provide invaluable service to the Indian industry by way of precision tooling and providing well-trained craftsmen in the area of tool and die making. These Tool Room are highly proficient in mould and die making technology and promote precision and quality in the development and manufacture of sophisticated moulds, dies and tools. The Tool Rooms are not only equipped with the best technology but are also abreast with the latest advancements like CAD/CAM, CNC machining for tooling, Vacuum Heat Treatment, Rapid Prototyping, etc.

The Tool Room & Training Centres also offer various training programmes to meet the wide spectrum of technical manpower required in the manufacturing sector. The training programmes are designed with optimum blend of theory and practice giving the trainees exposure on actual jobs and hands on working experience. The Tool Rooms have also developed special training programmes to meet the requirements at international level, which are attended by participants from all over the globe.


National Manufacturing Competitiveness Programme
The National Manufacturing Competitiveness Programme is the nodal programme of the Government of India to develop global competitiveness among Indian MSMEs. Conceptualised by the National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council, the Programme was initiated in 2007-08.

Export Promotion
Export promotion from the MSE sector has been accorded a high priority. To help MSEs in exporting their products, the following facilities/incentives are provided: (i) Products of MSE exporters are displayed in international exhibitions and the expenditure incurred is reimbursed by the Government; (ii) To acquaint MSE exporters with latest packaging standards, techniques, etc., training programme on packaging for exporters are organised in various parts of the country in association with the Indian Institute of Packaging; (iii) Under the MSE Marketing Development Assistance (MDA) Scheme, assistance is provided to individuals for participation in overseas fairs/exhibitions, overseas study tours, or tours of individuals as member of a trade delegation going abroad. The Scheme also offers assistance for (a) sector specific market study by MSE Associations/Export Promotion Councils/Federation of Indian Export Organisation; (b) Initiating/contesting anti-dumping cases by MSE Associations; and (c) reimbursement of 75 per cent of the one time registration fee and annual fee (recurring for first three years) charged by GSI India (formerly EAN India) for adoption of Bar Coding.

Infrastructure Development
For setting up of industrial estates and to develop infrastructure facilities like power distribution network, water, telecommunication, drainage and pollution control facilities, roads, banks, raw materials, storage and marketing outlets, common service facilities and technological back up services, etc, for MSMEs, the Integrated Infrastructural Development (IID) Scheme was launched in 1994. The scheme covers rural as well as urban areas with a provision of 50 per cent reservation for rural areas and 50 per cent industrial plots are to be reserved for the micro-enterprises. The Scheme also provides for up-gradation/strengthening of the infrastructural facilities in the existing industrial estates.

Fiscal Concessions
Under the General Excise Exemption Scheme, full excise exemption up to turnover of $375 thousand per annum is provided to enterprises having annual turnover of up to $1 million. However, the limits of excise exemptions has encouraged tendency among MSEs to go in for horizontal expansion (i.e. fragmentation) rather than vertical expansion and upward graduation into medium and large enterprises. For incentivising such graduation of small to medium/large enterprises so as to enable them to achieve economies of scale, extension of excise exemptions to the graduating medium enterprises on a tapering scale is under consideration of the Government.